It's been a number of years since others posted those places on the old VSFW, so I invite our members to refresh our memory as to where they were.
But by way of contrast, although it is not a nudist resort, per se, one place gives us an idea of how that might work. Thad's in San Diego is a swinger spot that has a mandatory full nudity for all men, yet women may wear clothes providing those clothes are "sexy". That includes a two-piece bathing suit, which some wear. I've been there a couple of times years ago. During my experiences, their policy, even though "clothing-optional" for females, resulted in a 100% pure CFNM situation. The entire evening I did not even see one exposed breast in a venue full of exposed penises and balls. Also, if one looks at clothing-optional beaches, the proportion of men that go nude is far higher than females. Outside of the male nudists, there are always a parade of men that remain clothed and cruise back and forth and back and forth on the beach gawking at the naked females. If such a policy were enacted at nude beaches, it would remove the male gawkers (which is the intent of such rules) and those beaches would become even more CFNM in nature. With the creep factor diminished, more females would go - both clothed and nudists.
It's not surprising that Texas would have such a policy, as southerners aren't known for their respect (or understanding) of Constitutional law. Although a different comparison, the application of anti-discrimination and gender equality came about in a suit filed against a clothing-optional resort in the Los Angeles area, Elysium Fields. The male plaintiff was upset that single men had to pay a significantly higher membership fee than women. The result was that the inequity in fee payment was deemed a violation of anti-discrimination laws resulting in the same fee owed by both males and females. I felt this resulted in a terrible impact to the resort in that women lost an important incentive for joining. However, I can't remember if it was tried in the state courts, or, federal courts. The latter would be far reaching in its impact.
So...one argument would be that the inequity in dress was also a violation of anti-discrimination law.
Regardless, most nudist resorts are either clothing-optional, or, "clothing-free", and apply to both genders. I've been to clothing-optional resorts such as Elysium Fields, and there was some very exciting CFNM moments when attractive young ladies were checking it all out yet remaining clothed. Nudist resorts (mandatory nudity), usually have areas designated as such, with the remaining areas being clothing-optional for both genders.
Conclusion - I hope our resident historians can remember those places that have double-standard clothing requirements as such places.
_________________ If the highest aim of a captain were to preserve his ship, he would keep it in port forever. ~ Thomas Aquinas
|